![Cover of A dialoge or communication of two persons: Deuysyd and set forthe in the late[n] tonge, by the noble and famose clarke. Desiderius Erasmus intituled [the] pylgremage of pure deuotyon. Newly tra[n]slatyd into Englishe.](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/14746/pg14746.cover.medium.jpg)
A dialoge or communication of two persons: Deuysyd and set forthe in the late[n] tonge, by the noble and famose clarke. Desiderius Erasmus intituled [the] pylgremage of pure deuotyon. Newly tra[n]slatyd into Englishe.
Written by Desiderius Erasmus
Chaptra reads alongside you — AI insights, chapter breakdowns and reader discussions for every book. Join free
About this book
Reading guide
Themes, characters and key ideas in A dialoge or communication of two persons: Deuysyd and set forthe in the late[n] tonge, by the noble and famose clarke. Desiderius Erasmus intituled [the] pylgremage of pure deuotyon. Newly tra[n]slatyd into Englishe., written by Chaptra AI.
- about 8 hours
- advanced
- Philosophical
- Witty
- Critical
Desiderius Erasmus's "A Dialoge or Communication of Two Persons: Deuysyd and set forthe in the late[n] tonge... intituled [the] pylgremage of pure deuotyon" is a seminal work of Christian Humanism from the early 16th century, presented as a vibrant Socratic dialogue. It meticulously dissects and critiques the prevailing religious practices of its time, particularly the efficacy and sincerity of pilgrimages and the veneration of relics. Through the conversational exchange between the skeptical Menedemus and the pilgrim Ogygyus, Erasmus employs wit and satire to challenge superficial piety, question the commercialization of faith, and advocate for an internal, genuine devotion over external rituals. The text serves as a powerful intellectual precursor to the Reformation, urging readers to discern true spiritual value from mere superstition.
“Is it then pure devotion to run about the world, rather than to lead a pure life?”
Key themes
- True vs. Superficial Devotion
- This is the central theme of the dialogue. Erasmus, through Menedemus, argues that genuine devotion lies in the purity of heart, moral conduct, and adherence to Christ's teachings, rather than in external rituals, physical journeys, or the veneration of material objects. He critiques the idea that spiritual merit can be earned through pilgrimages or relic worship, portraying them as potentially distracting from true faith.
- Critique of Religious Superstition and Idolatry
- Erasmus uses the dialogue to expose and condemn what he perceives as widespread superstition and idolatry within the Church. He questions the authenticity of many relics, the veracity of attributed miracles, and the superstitious beliefs that often accompany their veneration. The dialogue implies that an over-reliance on such practices borders on idolatry, diverting worship from God to material objects.
- Christian Humanism and Reform
- The dialogue is a prime example of Christian Humanism, advocating for a return to the simplicity and ethical core of early Christianity, based on a careful study of scripture and classical learning. Erasmus's critique of contemporary abuses was not intended to abandon the Church but to reform it from within, emphasizing inner piety and moral living over external observances, thereby laying intellectual groundwork for broader Reformation movements.
Worth discussing
How does Erasmus use satire to critique religious practices without appearing heretical?
Chapter-by-chapter breakdowns, character arcs and the full thematic analysis come with a free account.
Discussions
No one has started one yet
Questions this book opens up
No discussions yet
Be the first to start a discussion about this book!
Sign up to start the discussionReviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this book!