Skip to main content
Chaptra
Cover of Social Value: A Study in Economic Theory, Critical and Constructive

Social Value: A Study in Economic Theory, Critical and Constructive

Written by Benjamin M. (Benjamin McAlester) Anderson

Not rated yet — tap a star to review it

Chaptra reads alongside you — AI insights, chapter breakdowns and reader discussions for every book. Join free

About this book

"Social Value: A Study in Economic Theory, Critical and Constructive" by B. M. Anderson, Jr. is a scholarly work in economic theory written in the early 20th century. The text delves into the concept of social value, its criticism, and a constructive approach to developing a valid theory of value that serves both economic analysis and social understanding. The book emerges from contemporary debates within economics, reflecting the author's academic background and intellectual discourse at the time, particularly influenced by previous economists like Professor J. B. Clark. The opening of the work establishes the context for discussing the increasingly significant notion of "social value." It acknowledges the foundational contributions of J. B. Clark while setting the stage for a critique of existing theories that conflate individual and social values. The introduction outlines the author's position that current concepts of social marginal utility and social cost are inadequate, necessitating a deeper exploration of the relationship between individual values and social constructs. Anderson emphasizes the need to address the logical requirements of value in order to reconstruct economic theory based on sound epistemological and sociological foundations.

Reading guide

Themes, characters and key ideas in Social Value: A Study in Economic Theory, Critical and Constructive, written by Chaptra AI.

  • about 30 hours
  • advanced
  • analytical
  • critical
  • scholarly

Benjamin M. Anderson, Jr.'s "Social Value" is a seminal early 20th-century economic treatise that critically examines and seeks to reconstruct the theory of value. The book addresses the prevailing inadequacy in economic thought regarding the concept of 'social value,' particularly critiquing the conflation of individual and social values within existing frameworks like J. B. Clark's. Anderson argues that current notions of social marginal utility and social cost are fundamentally flawed, necessitating a deeper, more rigorous exploration of value's logical and epistemological foundations. His work aims to develop a valid theory of value grounded in sound sociological understanding, essential for both robust economic analysis and societal comprehension. It stands as a significant contribution to the historical debate on value theory and the philosophical underpinnings of economic science.

The fundamental confusion in much of current economic theory lies in its failure to distinguish rigorously between individual valuations and the concept of social value.

Key themes

The Nature of Value: Individual vs. Social
This is the central theme of the book, exploring the fundamental distinction between value derived from individual preferences and utility, and value that emerges from collective social processes, institutions, and norms. Anderson argues against the simple aggregation of individual values to form 'social value,' asserting that social value has its own distinct ontological and epistemological basis. He delves into how social constructs, common understanding, and societal structures contribute to value beyond purely subjective individual appraisals.
Critique of Neoclassical Economic Foundations
Anderson's work is a direct and systematic critique of the emerging neoclassical paradigm, particularly its reliance on marginal utility theory and its conceptualization of value. He challenges the logical consistency and explanatory power of these theories, arguing that they often fail to capture the full complexity of economic reality by reducing it to individualistic, quantifiable units. This theme highlights the intellectual ferment within economics as it sought to establish itself as a rigorous science.
Epistemological and Logical Rigor in Economic Theory
Anderson places significant emphasis on the philosophical underpinnings of economic analysis, arguing that a valid economic theory must meet stringent logical and epistemological requirements. This theme explores the nature of economic knowledge, how it is constructed, and the criteria by which economic theories should be judged. It is a call for greater self-awareness within economics regarding its own methodological foundations.

Worth discussing

How does Anderson's distinction between individual and social value challenge or complement contemporary economic models?

Chapter-by-chapter breakdowns, character arcs and the full thematic analysis come with a free account.

Discussions

No one has started one yet

Join

Questions this book opens up

No discussions yet

Be the first to start a discussion about this book!

Sign up to start the discussion

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first to review this book!