Skip to main content
Chaptra
Cover of Citt and Bumpkin (1680)

Citt and Bumpkin (1680)

Written by Roger L'Estrange

Not rated yet — tap a star to review it

Chaptra reads alongside you — AI insights, chapter breakdowns and reader discussions for every book. Join free

About this book

"Citt and Bumpkin" by Sir Roger L'Estrange is a political satire written in the late 17th century, during a time of intense social and political upheaval in England. This work is structured as a dialogue, featuring two characters: Citt, a savvy London citizen, and Bumpkin, a naïve rural bumpkin. Through their conversation, the text explores themes of political conspiracy, the impact of the Popish Plot, and the complexities of religious and governmental authority in Restoration England. The opening of "Citt and Bumpkin" immediately draws readers into a lively tavern conversation where the two main characters discuss their various tactics to promote petitions. Citt shares insights into the underhanded methods used to gather support, while Bumpkin reflects on the challenges faced in the countryside. As they detail their strategies, the irony of their corruption and dishonest practices unfolds, shedding light on the political animosities of their time. The dialogue cleverly critiques both the characters' immoral behaviors and the broader implications of political dissent and manipulation in a deeply divided society, setting the stage for further exploration of these themes throughout the work.

Read it with a club

Small groups reading the same books and talking as they go.

All clubs
Open books spread across a table

News

  • 4 members
  • 1,813 discussions
  • Active Sep 11

Read Citt and Bumpkin (1680) alongside people who are reading it too.

Chaptra Prime — paid clubs, every club feature, and unlimited reading support, for $5 a month or $60 once.

See Prime

Reading guide

Themes, characters and key ideas in Citt and Bumpkin (1680), written by Chaptra AI.

  • about 8 hours
  • advanced
  • satirical
  • political
  • ironic

Sir Roger L'Estrange's "Citt and Bumpkin" is a biting political satire from 1680, set against the tumultuous backdrop of Restoration England and the Popish Plot. Structured as a lively dialogue between Citt, a shrewd London citizen, and Bumpkin, a guileless rural counterpart, the work dissects the pervasive political corruption and manipulation of public opinion. Through their candid discussion in a tavern, the characters expose the dishonest tactics used to promote petitions, highlighting the stark contrast between urban political cunning and rural naiveté. The satire cleverly critiques not only the characters' immoral behaviors but also the broader societal implications of political dissent, religious tensions, and the contested nature of governmental authority in a deeply divided nation.

“"Why, Citt, these petitions of yours in London, they fly like wildfire, whilst we in the country scarce get a dozen honest hands!"”

Key themes

Political Corruption and Manipulation
This is the central theme, explored through the characters' candid discussion of their dishonest tactics in gathering support for petitions. The work exposes how public opinion is manufactured, how truth is distorted, and how individuals are coerced or misled for political gain, reflecting a deep cynicism about the integrity of the political process during the Restoration.
The Impact of the Popish Plot
The Popish Plot, a fabricated conspiracy that gripped England, serves as the crucial historical backdrop, fueling the anxieties and divisions that the characters exploit. The satire implicitly or explicitly references how the widespread fear of Catholicism and perceived threats to the Protestant establishment are leveraged by political actors to advance their agendas, demonstrating the power of fear in political mobilization.
Religious and Governmental Authority
The dialogue implicitly explores the contested nature of authority in Restoration England, where the power of the monarchy, Parliament, and the established church were under constant scrutiny and challenge. The petitioning process itself is a means of asserting or challenging authority, and the characters' methods reflect the struggle to control the narrative surrounding who holds legitimate power and how it should be exercised.

Worth discussing

How does L'Estrange use the dialogue structure to both reveal and critique political manipulation?

Chapter-by-chapter breakdowns, character arcs and the full thematic analysis come with a free account.

Discussions

No one has started one yet

Join

Questions this book opens up

No discussions yet

Be the first to start a discussion about this book!

Sign up to start the discussion

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first to review this book!