
Blood Atonement and the Origin of Plural Marriage: A Discussion
Written by Joseph Fielding Smith,R. C. (Richard C.) Evans
Chaptra reads alongside you — AI insights, chapter breakdowns and reader discussions for every book. Join free
About this book
Reading guide
Themes, characters and key ideas in Blood Atonement and the Origin of Plural Marriage: A Discussion, written by Chaptra AI.
- about 8 hours
- advanced
- Historical
- Polemical
- Debate
This work documents a pivotal historical discourse between Elder Joseph F. Smith Jr. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Richard C. Evans, a leader from the Reorganized Church. The correspondence vigorously debates the historical practices and doctrines of the Latter-day Saints, particularly plural marriage and the concept of blood atonement. Triggered by Evans' public accusations, Smith's responses meticulously defend the LDS Church's positions, referencing previous church documents and offering counterarguments. The exchange illuminates the deep theological and historical divisions within the broader Mormon faith during the early 20th century, revealing the complexities of doctrinal interpretation and historical memory. Ultimately, it serves as a critical historical document showcasing intra-faith tensions and the defense of core beliefs amidst public scrutiny.
“It is a grave misrepresentation to assert that the Church ever sanctioned violence under the guise of 'blood atonement' as commonly understood, and I shall provide ample evidence to clarify this doctrine.”
Key themes
- Religious Interpretation and Authority
- This theme explores how different leaders and factions within the broader Mormon movement interpret foundational doctrines and historical events. The debate highlights the struggle for doctrinal authority and the challenge of establishing a definitive understanding of religious truth when faced with divergent perspectives.
- Historical Memory and Revisionism
- The discussion deeply engages with how history is remembered, recounted, and potentially revised or defended by religious institutions. It explores the tension between historical fact, institutional narrative, and apologetic defense, particularly concerning controversial past practices.
- Intra-Faith Conflict and Schism
- The entire discourse is a testament to the deep-seated divisions and theological conflicts that emerged within the Mormon faith following the death of Joseph Smith. It illustrates how different factions developed distinct identities and doctrines, leading to ongoing contention over what constitutes 'true' Mormonism.
Worth discussing
How do historical documents and interpretations shape the identity and doctrines of religious organizations today?
Chapter-by-chapter breakdowns, character arcs and the full thematic analysis come with a free account.
Discussions
No one has started one yet
Questions this book opens up
No discussions yet
Be the first to start a discussion about this book!
Sign up to start the discussionReviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this book!